MERGER AND ACQUISITION PROCESS

 

1-GENERALLY

 

1.1 Merger and Acquisition

 

Merger refers to the process in which two companies, usually through the exchange of shares, become a single entity, and the legal personality of one partnership is absorbed into another. Acquisition, on the other hand, is defined as the complete or partial purchase of a company’s shares or assets by another company or individual.

 

2-SITUATIONS REQUIRING LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN THE MERGER AND ACQUISITION PROCESS

 

2.1 Tax Issues

 

The tax aspect of corporate merger transactions is regulated by various tax laws. In corporate mergers, the legal personality of the merged businesses ceases to exist. However, it is important to note that activities undertaken until the merger and the value increases that occur during the merger may fall within the scope of income or corporate tax regulations. In addition, double taxation avoidance agreements should not be overlooked in international mergers.

 

2.2 Due Diligence

 

The merger process is a complex process that is not easy. Mismatched goals of the companies involved in the merger pose a major problem. In order to achieve success in corporate mergers, comprehensive analysis and evaluation are necessary. This is where the concept of “Due Diligence” comes into play.

 

Due Diligence enables the acquisition of information about the target company and its careful analysis, examination, and evaluation. Due Diligence consists of four purposes: 1- Meeting the information needs regarding the target company, 2- Analysis, 3- Decision-making and  price determination, 4- Determining the legal situation.

 

The first stage of the Due Diligence process, which is the initial purpose, can be said to involve three stages. These stages include the planning of the merger, the investigation of the companies to be merged, and reaching a final agreement by negotiating with the designated company.

 

2.3 Selection of Accounting Method

 

In corporate mergers, there are two methods: pooling of interests and acquisition method. However, the pooling of interests method has been prohibited by US GAAP and IFRS/TFRS. Thus, the acquisition method is the only accounting method deemed appropriate under both US GAAP and IFRS/TFRS for corporate mergers.

 

2.4 Selection of Payment Method

 

In mergers and acquisitions, the financing of the merger should be determined taking into account the acquiring company’s ownership structure, financial leverage position, collateral and borrowing capacity, future profitability, and financial targets for the subsequent period. In addition, the financing of the merger is also influenced by factors such as the economic environment, the size of the agreement, its boundaries (whether it is cross-border), whether the companies are publicly traded, and legal regulations.

 

When determining the payment method to be used in corporate mergers, the most important factors are tax practices and transaction costs. It is necessary to establish how the financing will be realized before entering into consultations between companies. Because the financing method will directly affect the value created after the merger.

 

The factors such as the size of the transaction to be financed, the cash position of the acquiring company, demand for the shares of the target company, the conditions of the merger, and market conditions during the merger period are important in determining the payment methods in corporate mergers.

 

Theoretically, using any of the payment methods in mergers would not change the financial structure of the company since the valuation principles are the same for each method. However, in practice, this may vary. The acquiring company can apply a single method or use multiple methods in the merger. The selection of payment methods in mergers can follow a complex process. In addition, each payment method can lead to different outcomes for the parties involved. A merger can be proposed to the target company by the acquiring company through cash, stock, securities, or a combination of these. The payment method should be acceptable for both the merging and the merged company and should have the flexibility to address any differences that may arise during the negotiation process. Since the selection of the payment method in a merger brings up the issue of how the risk will be distributed among the parties involved, there should be harmony between the parties in this regard.

 

The commonly used payment methods in corporate mergers include:

 

  • Cash Payment
  • Payment through Stock Exchange
  • Payment through Preferred Stock and Bonds
  • Payment from the Future Earnings of the Company
  • Payment through Borrowing
  • Payment through the Issuance of High-Risk Bonds

 

© 2018 Kaptan Avukatlık Bürosu. Tüm Hakları Gizlidir. logo-footer

Bülent KAPTAN has set up his private practice as a member of Izmir Bar Association in 1991.
He was registered as Trademark and Patent Attorney to TPE (Turkish Patent Institute, not Turkish Patent and Trademark Office) in 1999. He has attended to Patent Attorneys Professional Training Programmes given by World Intellectual Property Organization as a distant education and an 8 months programme in TPE collabration with European Patent Office.

In 2002, he participated an English Translation Training for 20 months, organized by one of the M.E.B (Ministry of Education) affiliated private education institution.

He is a member of ICC Turkish National Committee and PEM Trademark and Patent Attorneys’ Assocation.

He has been writing in “Refrigeration World”, a publication of Aegean Region Refrigeration Industry and Business Association, since 2002.

He speaks English, German(A2) and Chinese (A2).

Stj. Av. Altınay TANRIYAKUL, 2000 Manisa doğumludur. Yaşar Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesinden 2023 yılında mezun olmuştur. Yaşar Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Yeni Medya ve İletişim Bölümünde eğitimi devam etmektedir. İngilizce bilmektedir.

Av. Özge ERDOĞAN, 1997 Adana doğumludur. 2019 yılında İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi’nden mezun olup 2019 yılından itibaren hukuk büromuzda çalışan ve aynı zamanda İzmir Ekonomi Üniversitesi’nde Özel Hukuk bölümünde yüksek lisans eğitimini sürdüren Özge ERDOĞAN ileri seviyede İngilizce bilmektedir.

 

Yönetici asistanı Selda GÜNEŞ, 1973 İzmir doğumludur. 2014 yılında Anadolu Üniversitesi Adalet bölümünden ve 2017 yılında Anadolu Üniversitesi Kamu Yönetimi bölümünden mezun olmuştur.

Selda GÜNEŞ, executive asistant, is graduated from Anadolu University, departmant of Justice in 2014 and departmant of Public Administration in 2017.

 

Trainee Lawyer Artun Alp KAPLAN has graduated from Kadir Has University Law Faculty in 2023. He wrote his thesis on the subject of Intellectual Property Rights. Artun Alp KAPLAN speaks Turkish and English.

 

Trainee Lawyer Altınay TANRIYAKUL is  graduated from Yasar University Faculty of Law in 2023. Ms. TANRIYAKUL continues her education at Yasar University, Faculty of Communication, departmant of New Media and Communication. Ms. TANRIYAKUL speaks English.

 

Selda GÜNEŞ, executive asistant, is graduated from Anadolu University, departmant of Justice in 2014 and departmant of Public Administration in 2017.


Avukat Gamze HOŞGEL, 1998 Hatay doğumludur. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi’nden 2021 yılında mezun olmuştur. İngilizce bilmektedir.


Lawyer Gamze HOŞGEL was born in Hatay in 1998. Ms. HOŞGEL graduated from Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Law in 2021. Ms. HOŞGEL speaks English.


Stj. Avukat Ataberk ŞİMŞİRLİ, 2001 yılında Adana’da doğmuştur. Uludağ Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi’nden 2024 yılında mezun olmuştur. İngilizce bilmektedir.


Traniee Lawyer Ataberk ŞİMŞİRLİ was born in 2001 in Adana. Ataberk ŞİMŞİRLİ has graduated from Uludağ University,Law Faculty in 2024. Mr. ŞİMŞİRLİ speaks English.